
What local data center deals reveal about Mark Cuban’s framework
Analysis by Policy Frameworks
Five local agreements show where communities negotiated similar protections and where the terms differ.
Read the analysisWe’re building the open standard for data center community benefit agreements with contributions from experts and communities alike.
Whether you’re a researcher, developer, concerned citizen, or policy expert, we’d love to hear from you.

Analysis by Policy Frameworks
Five local agreements show where communities negotiated similar protections and where the terms differ.
Read the analysisAn editor checks the material and your publication permission. Approved perspectives will appear here with an optional portrait and a link to the full contribution.
Read the contribution processPublic contracts, drafts and proposals for community benefits.
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Draft terms covering water use, clean energy, community funding and local hiring.
View agreementEl Paso, Texas
City incentives for the Wurldwide project, with conditions for receiving grants.
View agreementFrederick County, Maryland
Proposed community investments, land conservation and development rights.
View agreementFind agreement terms by topic.
What water does a project use, and what happens during a shortage?
Who pays for new capacity, and who carries the risk?
What does the community receive, after incentives and public costs?
Which jobs are promised, and how will the community know?
How are nearby residents and shared resources protected?
Who can enforce the agreement when a commitment is missed?
Learn what they cover, who negotiates them and why we’re building an open framework.
Mark Cuban called for crowdsourcing a standard agreement that puts community benefits at the heart of data center development. This independent project takes up that call, bringing together public contracts, local experience and proposed language to help communities negotiate better terms.